When evaluating worker performance, which of the following factors is EXCLUDED?

In evaluating worker performance, it is important to consider various factors that contribute to a comprehensive assessment. While self-assessment, supervisor ratings, and goal attainment are common components of performance evaluations, peer reviews are often excluded in many formal evaluation processes. This is because peer reviews can sometimes introduce bias or subjective opinions that may not accurately reflect an individual's performance in a consistent or standardized manner.

Self-assessment encourages employees to reflect on their performance, enhancing self-awareness and accountability. Supervisor ratings provide a direct evaluation from someone in a position of authority, which can carry weight in determining performance outcomes. Goal attainment assesses how well employees meet established objectives, which is a key indicator of overall effectiveness in a role.

By excluding peer reviews from the evaluation process, organizations can focus on more structured and objective measures of performance, thereby promoting fairer assessments based on criteria that are typically more standardized and reliable.